| judge jeanine was right.........
|March 26, 2019|
Welcome to the Haynes Report!
Texans Republican lawmakers are caving to the left. Without passing any of the top five legislative priorities from the Texas GOP Platform, Republicans are pushing bills for massive government spending and increased government control. The public is deeply angered over the direction of public education yet even conservative Republican lawmakers are supporting education bills that will continue the insanity in our schools. If Republicans continue on this trajectory for the rest of the session, will conservatives turn out to vote in 2020? After all, if Republicans are going to vote like Democrats…….
Drugging Kids For Profit
...Texas Republican Lawmakers Lead Charge On Nanny State Mental Health Bills
March 26, 2019
Although Texas Governor Greg Abbott had promised voters property tax relief and school finance reform, he declared mental health to be an “emergency item” for the 2019 legislative session. In response, nearly 150 mental health bills were filed with House and Senate Republicans leading the charge. The Grand Daddy of them all is Senate Bill 10 authored by Senator Jane Nelson and signed onto by 31 Senators.
If this legislation passes, Abbott’s big government “mental health emergency” will cost the Texas taxpayers nearly $8 BILLION!
After the 2018 deadly shooting of more than 10 at Santa Fe High School, Abbott pandered to the leftists’ usual call for gun control with a “School and Firearm Safety Action Plan.” Citizens and gun rights organizations rose up against the Red Flag Laws recommended in the plan. "Citizens Education Coalition," led by this writer, sent the governor and Republican lawmakers a letter about their concerns over mental health issues in the plan. Lawmakers ignored the people and filed dozens of mental health bills to implement a massive mental health program for K-12.
Abbott’s reaction to school violence is a reminder of that of Obama. Using the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre as justification, the Obama administration quietly introduced a behavioral and mental health program into public schools. Under the 2013 executive policy, “Now is the Time: The President’s Plan to Protect Our Children and Our Communities By Reducing Gun Violence,” more than $150 million dollars in federal funding was provided to K-12 schools to test students for signs of mental health issues.
Professor James. F. Tracy, in Global Research, suggests there may be broader motives and agendas than student mental health.
Since the early 1990s the psychiatry profession has been pushing for “mental health screenings” to find new patients. Pushing community mental health providers into public education means a steady revenue stream created by diagnosing children with mental disorders which will then be treated with drugs purchased from Big Pharma. Health care dollars from insurance companies for treatment and from government agencies for research yield still more revenue.
Records of assessments, whether real or just imagined by a mental health provider, will follow children the rest of their lives. Many will become dependent on the highly addictive psychotropic drugs known as neuroleptics and will suffer from an array of adverse side affects.
According to a 2017 report, the rate of antidepressant use in the United States increased nearly 400 percent over the last two decades. With community mental health providers on school campuses, this will become an even greater national crisis.
The fundamental cause of most psychiatric disorders is not understood. If the cause is not known, there will be many students who will be mis-diagnosed. Yet it will be virtually impossible for parents to get the errors corrected in a child’s record that will follow him from school to workforce.
Massive amount of personal data will be collected with even more by the federal government for programs using federal grants. There is no medical confidentially protection for this data.
Where does this data go? It is stored in state longitudinal databases required by the federal government several years ago as an end run around the federal ban on collecting personal data. It is also stored at the U.S. Department of Education and through the new de facto national database will be shared with other federal agencies -- a government file on each citizen.
The interest of the U.S. government in funding mental health services in public schools to test students for psychological and behavioral traits has roots in the World Health Organization. This U.N. agency was created to assist nations in changing and monitoring their citizens’ beliefs and worldviews for a New World Order. The WHO director stated that it would be the role of the public schools to overcome the poisonous influences of American “parents [and] Sunday and day school teachers.”
Texas Senate Bill 10 boldly states the mental health centers will provide “consultation services and training opportunities for pediatricians and primary care providers” – read that as Texas kids will be guinea pigs for training medical providers with the taxpayers funding it.
A Media Advisory announcing a March 28 press conference in Austin, Texas by The Coalition for Protection of Parental Rights regarding the numerous Texas mental health bills sums it up,
“Taxpayer-funded universities and the dysfunctional Health & Human Services Commission will have direct authority over millions more of our tax dollars. We all know that once they are funded to start looking for a problem, they are going to find one. Conflicts of interest from pharmaceutical companies, special interests, and the universities themselves will be unavoidable under this structure. Teachers, parents and school kids don’t need this kind of help from state government!”
Public schools are no longer academic learning centers. They are now profit centers – worth trillions – for big business.
Judge Jeanine Was Right
March 18, 2019
During the opening segment of her March 10 Fox News show, Judge Jeanine Pirro posed the question about whether the hijab – Muslim headscarf – signifies that Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) is loyal to Sharia (Islamic law) rather than the U.S. Constitution for which she took an oath to protect and defend.
"Omar wears the hijab, which according to the Quran 33:59, tells women to cover so they won’t get molested. Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?"
Backlash was swift with Fox News Network suspending the show. Fox staffer Hufsa Kamal tweeted, “@JudgeJeanine, can you stop spreading this false narrative that somehow Muslims hate America or women who wear a hijab aren’t American enough? You have Muslims working at the same network you do, including myself."
Kamal’s tweet refocused the real intent of Pirro’s question to a narrative that Muslims are being labeled un-American because they outwardly show evidence of their faith. Just as Omar shifted the focus of the U.S. House Resolution, originally intended to rebuke her anti-Semitic remarks, to “Islamophobia,” so did Kamal’s tweet divert attention from the truth about hijabs.
Lying or dissimulation -- taqiyah -- is not only condoned, but recommended to Muslims in the Quran. A Muslim canm and will, lie without any compunction if it is necessary to protect or further Islam.
Judge Jeanine responded with a weak but non-apologetic statement to Fox News Network and viewers,
"I've seen a lot of comments about my opening statement from Saturday night's show and I did not call Rep. Omar un-American. My intention was to ask a question and start a debate, but of course because one is Muslim does not mean you don’t support the Constitution."
Yet Pirro was correct in her opening statement that Omar submits to Sharia. Adherence to Islamic law can be visibly seen both in a Muslim’s dress and prayers (how they pray), as well as their comments and actions in life. Pirro was only stating a truth: that Muslim women are required to wear hijabs because Sharia requires it. Pirro also correctly indicated that Omar’s adherence to Sharia means that she cannot uphold the Constitution. Sharia is deemed divine law and does not permit Muslims to live under any other legal system, including the U.S. Constitution which Muslims deem manmade law.
The Muslim Brotherhood has made it clear that its mission is to overthrow the U.S. Constitution and impose Sharia. The pattern of Islam is to use the courts, schools, art museums, political offices, and other major institutions including outreach to churches to infiltrate, gradually introduce Sharia, and then finally takeover a nation.
This open hostility by Muslims will only increase as the numbers of Muslims in America increases.
According to Pew Research Center, "By 2040, Muslims will replace Jews as the nation’s second-largest religious group after Christians. And by 2050, the U.S. Muslim population is projected to reach 8.1 million, or 2.1% of the nation’s total population — nearly twice the share of today."
Statistics show that once the Muslim population in a nation reaches 2% of the total population, they become openly hostile and intolerant of anyone who opposes them and attempt to silence critics through any possible means. The main target is Christians and Jews. Compliance to Sharia is mandatory – even praying at the correct times – and those who choose to ignore the law face stoning, beating, mutilation of body parts, and even beheading. Leaving Islam is punishable by death.
The future of personal freedoms for Americans, and especially that of Jews and Christians, is dark indeed.
Will -- Can -- Omar Uphold the Constitution?
Published March 14, 2019 World Net Daily
For those naive enough to believe there is no plan for an Islamic takeover of America, listen to the Muslims themselves.
In the video clip that recently went viral, Islamic activist Sharifa Alkhateeb talks about converting America to an Islamic nation living under Sharia law that trashes the Constitution and our freedom.
“We do not want to melt into American society and disappear. We want to go into American society with Islamic ideals and revamp their thinking. We want to revamp them. We want to turn them into Muslim individuals.”
Although that recording was made in 1989 during the "Muslim Americans Political Awareness Conference," the future envisioned in Alkhateeb’s speech is already evident.
The website of JETPAC (Justice Education Technology Political Advocacy Center) states that the 2018 mid-term election was a record year for American Muslim involvement in politics with at least 128 running for office and 50 winning with four of those at the federal level. This is the highest number since 2000 when 700 ran and 153 were elected. JETPAC’s purpose is clear: “build a strong American Muslim political infrastructure and increase our community’s influence and engagement. We will take our place at the table across all levels of government.”
In January 2019, the first two Muslim women in Congress, Minnesota's Ilhan Omar and Michigan's Rashida Tlaib, were sworn in. Instead of using the Bible, each placed her hand on the Muslim scripture, the Quran, and swore to "support and defend the U.S. Constitution...So help me God." For American citizens, the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land and no other legal system is permitted in America, including Sharia.
Did these two Muslims lie about upholding the Constitution? Can one be a devout Muslim and uphold the U.S. Constitution? Muslims are required to live under Sharia which is deemed divine law and does not permit them to live under any other legal system. Devout Muslims believe that the U.S. Constitution is just human law and is, therefore, inferior to the divine law of Sharia. How can a devout Muslim recite the Pledge of Allegiance -- "one nation under God " -- when a Muslim is a Ummanhist – a citizen of international Islam required to live under Allah?
Either these women are ignorant of the implication of their pledges or they are purposely lying. However, this action of lying or dissimulation -- taqiyah -- is not only condoned, but recommended to Muslims in the Quran. Therefore, a Muslim can and will lie without any compunction if it is necessary to protect or further Islam.
Omar has already shown her determination to go "into American society with Islamic ideals and revamp their thinking." Bristling at the U.S. House resolution that originally was intended to rebuke her anti-Semitic remarks, freshman Democrat Rep. Ilhan Omar shifted the focus to “Islamophobia.”
With House Speaker Nancy Pelosi facing rebellion in the Democrat ranks and concern that Omar would be unfairly singled out as a Muslim, the resolution was drastically altered from anti-Semitism to a broad anti-bigotry message. After the vote of 407-23 with only 23 Republicans voting against the watered down resolution, Omar and her radical left buds gloated over their success.
“Today is historic on many fronts. It’s the first time we have voted on a resolution condemning Anti-Muslim bigotry in our nation’s history.….We are tremendously proud to be part of a body that has put forth a condemnation of all forms of bigotry including anti-Semitism, racism, and white supremacy. At a time when extremism is on the rise, we must explicitly denounce religious intolerance of all kinds and acknowledge the pain felt by all communities.”
Omar’s reward for her repeated anti-Semitic remarks? She will continue to sit on the House Foreign Affairs, although Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) was stripped of his committee assignments for remarks he made regarding white supremacy earlier this year.
Omar’s success in attacking Israel and Jews without retribution signals that Jewphobia and Christianphobia are acceptable and will be rewarded in the halls of Congress. This will most certainly embolden more Muslims to seek political office. Beware Americans, we may be closer to a Sharia state than we realize.
Please visit my other website: www.americancitizensmatter.com
|To unsubscribe, click here...|